![]() ![]() The ancient cosmologies seem to be true, but here is a modern science theory which shows that it might be wrong.Īt some point you just have to give it up. Science is filled with anomaly after anomaly, and illusion after illusion, which shows that RE and Heliocentrism seems to be wrong, but is with some theory really correct. The specific claims about what science says are correct. ![]() I already know that it's not possible, since I did the research with the community to make the articles in the first place. However, I don't truly expect anyone to present anything substantial showing that those articles are wrong. Hours were spent collecting and putting together the material, so I kind of expect the same. I would prefer to see you guys debate the material presented to you rather than making excuses for why you don't need to debate it. There are plenty of platforms they can publish on. I want them to to to and conduct opposition research on their specific subject of interest and provide an equal or greater amount of evidence showing that the points in the articles are false. Quote from: Tom Bishop on January 27, 2023, 09:32:51 AM Tell them that I don't want a chatroom debate. In order to debate that you will need to actually need to take the time to perform research to support your position. This can't be directly debated by RE on the fly in an impromptu chatroom debate. Rather than finding reasons why you don't have to argue about it, how about hitting the books and creating a compelling argument with numerous references like the above article showing that it actually does work without cheats. Here is another one: Three Body Problem. When this was posted the arguments revolved around reasons why the points in the article don't need to be addressed, rather than actually addressing them. Here is one: Astronomy is a pseudoescience. When the RE here are presented with those articles we mainly just see some kind of argument about why they don't have to address it. ![]() I want them to go to and conduct opposition research on their specific subject of interest and provide an equal or greater amount of evidence showing that the points in the articles are false. Tell them that I don't want a chatroom debate. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |